|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
|
|
+# Performance of Operations Lead `515-l1dev`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Provided Reports
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+| Links | Date | Note |
|
|
|
+|-----------------|------|------|
|
|
|
+| [Report June](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/500?replyIdx=1) | June 2021 (weeks 24-28) | On-chain forum |
|
|
|
+| [Report July](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/500?replyIdx=2) | July 2021 (weeks 29-31) | On-chain forum |
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Operations Lead `515-l1dev`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Note
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. No `text proposal` was provided for reports.
|
|
|
+2. List of tasks you can read [here](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/operations/operations_task_list.md)
|
|
|
+3. Status of tasks and proposed payments you can read [here](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/347) PR [here](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/248)
|
|
|
+4. ``Reporting requirements for Op Group 1`` was created as a [proposal](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/142) only. Not added to Github by mistake.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Compare with [Reporting requirements for Op Group 1](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/142)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Frequency - 1 week. But ``515-l1dev`` provided his report once a month.
|
|
|
+2. ``A simple breakdown of current tasks and the status`` - Done
|
|
|
+3. ``A simple breakdown of each worker, what they're working on and what skills they have`` - Done
|
|
|
+4. ``Any issues encountered or anything that needs attention`` - Done
|
|
|
+5. Set reawards for Operations Workers - Done
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Compare with [Helpdesk](https://github.com/Joystream/helpdesk/tree/master/roles/operators)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Operations Lead
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Available on Discord - Done
|
|
|
+2. Hire/fire/warn opearations workers - Done
|
|
|
+3. Manage Opearations Workers - Done
|
|
|
+4. Replenished Opearations Working Group Mint
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Operations Workers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Development Group are working a lot.
|
|
|
+2. Promotion Group still under discussion
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Performance for the Lead
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- At least 95% of the work he did
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Performance for the Workers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Development Group. Tasks [here](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/248)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `isonar` showed a lot of activity. Active in Discord also
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `nexusfallout` improved storage size bot. Active in Discord also
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `freakstatic` showed a lot of activity. Active in Discord also
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `lkskrn` showed a lot of activity.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `dapplooker` showed a lot of activity.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Promotion Group
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `maxlevush` showed some idea only
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `drmarkovi` -
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `stwoof` showed some idea only
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `shtihmas` new
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `palladium` new
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Suggestion for the path forward
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+According to [WG Lead Term Limits](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/rules/WG_Lead_Term_Limits.md) Lead's term soon ends.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Operations Lead `515-l1dev` showed great efficiency. It is difficult to propose that someone will now be able to take his place
|
maxlevush