# Antioch - Council Election Round #3 - Performance Review and Minutes ## 1 - Basic Information ### 1.1 - Introduction The council is expected to produce reports during each round and provide feedback in the form of workflow, challenges, thinking and performance as well as minutes covering important events during the council session. Usernames referenced are Joystream usernames. All times are calculated based on 6 second blocktimes and not actual blocktimes. The Council Round number is taken from the chain, the KPI rounds have an offset number. This report was compiled by @tomato with assistance from @freakstatic ### 1.2 - Council Round Overview * Council Election Round: #6 * Council Term: 3 * Start Block: #378000 * End Block: #478800 * Forum thread for round feedback: N/A ### 1.3 - Council members & vote participation * All usernames are listed in the order given by `activeCouncil` from chain state. * Votes cast includes all types of vote (Approve, Reject, Abstain & Slash) * In the event a proposal is not finalized within the current council, it will be indicated and current council votes will not be recorded due to system limitations | Username | Member ID | Prop. Votes Cast | CM Own Stake | CM Voter Stake | |----------------------|-----------|------------------|--------------|----------------| | @julysake | 2124 | 7 | 3914300 | 0 | | @blackmass | 361 | 4 | 5000000 | 0 | | @anthony | 129 | 7 | 6000000 | 0 | | @xandrell | 867 | 15 | 10000 | 3000000 | | @nkhlghbl | 1962 | 14 | 50000 | 3000000 | | @doppelganger23 | 2039 | 8 | 6000000 | 3000000 | | @freakstatic_council | 321 | 14 | 1000000 | 6330000 | | @leet_joy | 957 | 13 | 2000000 | 3000000 | | @fierydev | 439 | 14 | 6666666 | 0 | | @wasabi | 1497 | 13 | 10000 | 3100000 | | @nexusfallout | 4 | 14 | 7000000 | 100 | | @cheomsk | 552 | 10 | 1000 | 6000100 | | @tomato | 2 | 13 | 1000000 | 6330100 | | @masteel | 2109 | 10 | 60000 | 3102000 | | @lopegor | 1369 | 9 | 1000 | 1135200 | | @manipal | 355 | 0 | 6000000 | 0 | | | | | | | | Total Stake | | | | 82710466 | ### 1.4 - Council Roles * Council Secretary * @tomato ### 1.5 - Council Mint & Budget Status * Start minted: 59704696 tokens * End minted: 100409182 tokens * Total minted during council round: 40704486 tokens (+68.18% from start) * Budget proposal link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/72 * Budget forum link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/388?replyIdx=2 (Note: The council budget is now based on the rewards for roles, council payments and validator payments. Jsgenesis decides how much to set the mint to.) ## 2 - Minutes ### 2.1 - Proposal Overview Proposal Types - 21 Proposals Created - 10 Text Proposals - 6 Spending Proposals - 4 SetWorkingGroupLeaderReward Proposals - 1 SetWorkingGroupMintCapacity Proposals - 0 BeginReviewWorkingGroupLeaderApplication - 0 TerminateWorkingGroupLeaderRole - 0 FillWorkingGroupLeaderOpening - 0 SetValidatorCount - 0 AddWorkingGroupLeaderOpening - 0 SetElectionParameters - 0 RuntimeUpgrade Proposal States - 16 Approved & executed proposals - 3 Canceled proposals - 0 Rejected proposals - 0 Slashed proposals - 0 Expired proposals - 2 proposals passed to next council - These proposals didn't gather enough quorum in the current council term, so the votes are reset and passed to the next council. Failed Proposals - 2 NotEnoughCapacity failures - Token value: 23688100 tokens - 0 ExecutionFailed - Total time for proposals to finalize: 278.62 hours - Average time for proposals to finalize: 17.41 hours - This average is calculated from all proposals, including expired proposals but excluding canceled proposals. - Proposals which are not successfully voted by the current council are considered finalized at the final blockheight of the current council. So if the current council has 50 hours to vote on proposal, but does not fully vote and the proposal is passed onto the next council, this 50 hours is included in the average time to finalize. ### 2.2 - Proposal Breakdown #### Proposal 59 - Content Curator opening - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/59 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 51,633 blocks (86.05 hours) - Created by: @l1dev - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @blackmass, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23, @masteel, @julysake #### Proposal 60 - Community Bounty #4: Telegram Bot - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/60 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & ExecutionFailed (NotEnoughCapacity) - Time to finalize: 17,486 blocks (29.14 hours) - Created by: @l1dev - Participants: @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @blackmass, @fierydev, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @masteel, @julysake #### Proposal 61 - Bounty 14: Submission 15-17 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/61 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & ExecutionFailed (NotEnoughCapacity) - Time to finalize: 3,141 blocks (5.23 hours) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: @nexusfallout, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @lopegor, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23. #### Proposal 62 - Antioch - KPI 3.2 - Council Secretary - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/62 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 1,191 blocks (1.98 hours) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23, @julysake #### Proposal 63 - Update Storage Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/63 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Cancelled - Time to finalize: N/A - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: #### Proposal 64 - Update Curator Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/64 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Cancelled - Time to finalize: N/A - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: #### Proposal 65 - Update Curator Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/65 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Cancelled - Time to finalize: N/A - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: #### Proposal 66 - Update Storage Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/66 - Proposal Type: SetWorkingGroupLeaderReward - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 6,959 blocks (11.59 hours) - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: @tomato, @freakstatic_council, @blackmass, @fierydev, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23, @masteel #### Proposal 67 - Update Curator Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/67 - Proposal Type: SetWorkingGroupLeaderReward - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 5,448 blocks (9.08 hours) - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: @tomato, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23 #### Proposal 68 - Resub: Bounty 14: Submission 15-17 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/68 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: 2688100 - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 2,640 blocks (4.4 hours) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @blackmass, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @lopegor, @wasabi, @doppelganger23, @masteel #### Proposal 69 - KPI 2.5 - Tokenomics report - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/69 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 8,829 blocks (14.715 hours) - Created by: @freakstatic_council - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @wasabi, @masteel #### Proposal 70 - Antioch - KPI 2.5 - Council Minutes - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/70 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 10,931 blocks (18.21 hours) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @masteel #### Proposal 71 - Fill Working Group Mint Capacity - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/71 - Proposal Type: SetWorkingGroupMintCapacity - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 9,802 blocks (16.33 hours) - Created by: @igrex - Participants: @nexusfallout, @anthony, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @lopegor, @nkhlghbl, @masteel, @julysake #### Proposal 72 - Antioch KPI 3.x - Antioch WG Budget 2 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/72 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 3,152 blocks (5.25 hours) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23, @masteel, @julysake #### Proposal 73 - Prize pot for bounty 10 II - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/73 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: 8128300 - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 15,673 blocks (26.12 hours) - Created by: @oiclid - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @doppelganger23 #### Proposal 74 - Re: Community Bounty #4: Telegram Bot - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/74 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: 21000000 - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 8,082 blocks (13.47 hours) - Created by: @l1dev - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @julysake #### Proposal 75 - Bounty #12: Endpoints May/2021 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/75 - Proposal Type: Spending - Amount: 5000000 - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 8,023 blocks (13.37 hours) - Created by: @l1dev - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @cheomsk, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @julysake #### Proposal 76 - Update Storage Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/76 - Proposal Type: SetWorkingGroupLeaderReward - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 6,624 blocks (11.04 hours) - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @masteel #### Proposal 77 - Update Curator Lead reward for Budget 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/77 - Proposal Type: SetWorkingGroupLeaderReward - Amount: N/A - Status: Approved & Executed - Time to finalize: 7,594 blocks (12.65 hours) - Created by: @nkhlghbl - Participants: @tomato, @nexusfallout, @anthony, @freakstatic_council, @fierydev, @xandrell, @leet_joy, @wasabi, @nkhlghbl, @masteel #### Proposal 78 - Antioch - Storage WG Reporting Reqs 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/78 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: (passed to next council) - Time to finalize: (passed to next council) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: (passed to next council) #### Proposal 79 - Antioch - Curator WG Reporting Reqs 1 - Proposal Link: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/79 - Proposal Type: Text - Amount: N/A - Status: (passed to next council) - Time to finalize: (passed to next council) - Created by: @tomato - Participants: (passed to next council) ### 2.4 - Select threads & events ### 2.5 - Working Group Spotchecks - Storage Role Spot Check: (this wasn't performed during the council session) - Curator Role Spot Check: (this wasn't performed during the council session) ## 3 - Review ### 3.1 - Workflow, Performance, Challenged & Thinking * N/A ## 4 - Obligations Council obligations are payments or items that carry through council sessions. These are noted so that future councils can easily see what items they should be aware of. Items can be removed from here once they have been resolved or become outdated. ### 4.1 Current Documents / Processes - Council Report - Each council should produce a report which highlights important events, council participation, mint spending and other important facts surrounding the council term - Council Budget - This is a proposal which tries to guide how many tokens the current council may have available to it during a term. This is a non binding proposal, so is mainly used as a guide for now. ### 4.2 Regular Payments / Proposals - Council Mint - The council mint needs to be checked on a regular basis and in the event it is near depletion, a council member should notify a member of Jsgenesis in order for it to be refilled. - The council mint is set at a value decided by Jsgenesis. - Council Roles - Council Secretary - This role was introduced in Council Round #18 and the payments are now managed by KPI rewards. - Content Curator Mint - The Content Curator Mint currently has a maximum value of 5 million tokens. - The Content Curator Mint has to be filled periodically and the agreed amount was discussed earlier. The amount may change in the future, but the rewards for this role are dependent on the council passing these proposals in a timely fashion. - The Content Curator Lead role is expected to keep track of their mint level and any member of the Joystream platform can create a proposal to refill this mint. - Storage Mint - The Storage Mint currently has a maximum value of 5 million tokens. - This mint has be refilled periodically - The Storage Lead role is expected to keep track of their mint level and any member of the Joystream platform can create a proposal to refill this mint. ### 4.2 Bounties - Bounties are shown on the forum Bounties section: https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/categories/10 ## 5 - Report changelog - 04.11.2020 - added working group review section - 22.10.2020 - updated budget section to reflect nature of new budget system - updated events to be threads & events - 14.09.2020 - removed member addresses and replaced with member IDs since they take less space - added realized and unrealized spending