|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
+This report aims to answer the questions of the KPI 11.4.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1) After the proposal was executed (#1937365), how quickly did the new validators show up?
|
|
|
+**It took around 10 days (05/02/2021-15/02/2021) for the number of validators to grow from 47 to 80.**
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+2) Was there any clear patterns for the new validators?
|
|
|
+**There was a small increase from 05/02/2021 until 09/02/2021 of one or two new validators per day.
|
|
|
+ Between 09/02/2021 and 10/02/2021 the number increase from from 59 to 72.
|
|
|
+ Until 15/02/2021 the number kept increasing by really slow.**
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+4) Did the number of network nodes increase 'proportionally'? (Might be hard to figure out, unless you've configured your node to accept >80 peers.)
|
|
|
+**Since no data was saved about the peers, the data from the active and waiting validators were used.
|
|
|
+ As can been seen in the Validator Status graph the number of nodes increased drastically.
|
|
|
+ By the end of 16/02/2021 already 40 nodes were in the waiting list.**
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+5) What happened to the rewards in tJOY and USD terms?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+6) Was there a spike in tokens staked, or were they just shifted?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+7) What happened to the average block time, and blocks per era and session/epoch?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+8) Anything else that was noteworthy?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Data available here:
|
|
|
+https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mG8m59IZyc3VLy_2ujTpZLXq_gMxPxv1V2SaHF1kX6E/edit?usp=sharing
|
Ricardo Maltez